![]() This is not a question concerning the English language, because you would face the same dilemma whether you approach in Russian, Hindi, Swedish or Tagalog. This answer should be answered by a Math professor for 1st year Math students. However, if neither dimensions are specified in terms of x or y, for example, ROI against Investment, we would usually make ROI the vertical axis and Investment the horizontal axis. In the case of closed-conics: circles and ellipses, there is no difference in plotting vert against horz or horz against vert because there are always two values of v for each value of u, and similarly two values of u for each value of v. Such that there are more than one value of u for every v, but only one value v for every u, it is quite obvious we should be conveniently plotting v against u, regardless of the orientation of their respective axes. For example, quadratic functions and open-curve conics, The assumption that the average value of u in the population is zero, E(u) 0 is not restrictive as it is simply obtained by rescaling the levels of innate ability of persons in the population so as to arrive at an average of zero in the population of all working people. Further assume u is the same as innate ability. For higher order graphs, it would be rather obvious what is being plotted against which. Let y be wage and x be years of education. Note : Number of inputs for x and number of inputs for y must be same. We will write the equation of this line as y12x1 with an accent on the y to indicate that the y-values computed using this equation are not from the data. It does not give only the regression equation of x on y and also it will give you the slope, arithmetic means of x and y and intercept. Find the line of regression of y on x from the following table. Regression assumes X is fixed with no error, such as a dose amount or temperature setting. Visually, which often would appear mutually indiscriminatable for 1-1 mapping plots. The calculator provided in this section can be used to find regression equation of x on y. With correlation, the X and Y variables are interchangeable. Much of applied econometric analysis begins with the following premise: Y and X are two variables. The convention is that x would occupy the horizontal axis, while y occupies the vertical axis, regardless if x is plotted against y, or y against x. Introduction to the Simple Linear Regression Model 1/2. OTOH, when mathematically necessary, we would also plot x against y, Which is a mapping of y values against a range of x values related thro the function f(x). Usually, plotting against x is a plot of function f(x) against a horizontal value of x: Notes: This is intended to expand on the theme of There is no necessity to bring a causal link between x and y into a 'philosophical' discussion.This question should be asked in the Mathematics department. $\hat \beta_1^\prime$, respectively) are mathematically equivalent. Traditional statistical tests of the null hypotheses $\rho = 0,\,\beta_1 = 0,$Īnd $\beta_1^\prime = 0,$ (based on $r$, $\hat \beta_1$, and The only difference is in the way you post the question and how you interpret the results. In both ways you are essentially estimating a linear correlation between $X$ and $Y$. I.e., your underlying question is "how poverty rate effects the GDP?". While in $X = \beta_0 \beta_1Y \epsilon$, your reasoning is reversed. Hence, by controlling the GDP you can alter the poverty rate. So, you can say that you are assuming that the poverty rate depends on the GDP level. In this case $Y$ is called dependent variable, whilst $X$ is independent. I.e., there is some linear function with a noise term $\epsilon$, where the assumptions on the noise term determines the best estimating procedure of $\beta_0$ and $\beta_1$. Namely, in a classical regression analysis you assume that the "real" underlying model that explains a poverty rate ($Y$) is the GDP ($X$) that is given by $Y = \beta_0 \beta_1X \epsilon$. I.e., if you understand the technical aspects of the changes in the coefficients, then anything else is just kind of philosophy. IMHO, the "actual meaning" is not a mathematical question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |